There Are Plenty of Reasons to Be Concerned About Bioweapons Development—Even Without AI
wired ·
In a recent interview, author Annie Jacobsen discusses her new book, Biological War: A Scenario, which explores the severe risks of biological weapons without relying on artificial intelligence as a primary factor. She argues that genetic engineering and gain-of-function research already provide sufficient means to create extinction-level pathogens, making AI-related concerns secondary to existing dangers. Jacobsen highlights that accidental releases from high-security laboratories pose a greater statistical threat than deliberate attacks due to the widespread nature of such facilities globally. The conversation reveals disturbing details about government contingency plans, including 'devolution' protocols where officials retreat to bunkers during catastrophic pandemics. Experts interviewed by Jacobsen express alarm over the arrogance of some scientists who prioritize publishing research over public safety considerations. Additionally, historical context regarding Soviet-era bioweapons programs underscores the persistent and evolving nature of these threats. Ultimately, Jacobsen aims to shift public focus from hypothetical AI fears to tangible, immediate risks associated with dual-use biotechnology.
wired